• BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Fun facts!

    85% of people arrested with fentanyl at the border as U.S. citizens.

    The vast majority of people arrested here for trafficking children are U.S. citizens (and children are over 3x more likely to be trafficked by an acquaintance or relative than they are a random kidnapper).

    “Illegal aliens” commit less crime than natural born U.S. citizens.

    Violent immigrants, perverted trans people, and incompetent DEI hires are all moral panics. You hear so much about them because the Republican party has nothing to offer that will make your life safer or easier.

  • cowfodder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Did this stupid mother fucker really refer to the Prime Minister of Canada as “governor”? Can’t tell if pushing the 51st state bullshit or he’s just that fucking dumb!

    • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      He thinks speaking diminutively to people automatically puts him in a position of power over them

      It’s an insecurity issue common with bullying

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I wish people would start responding by referring to him as “washed up reality TV personality Trump”, or even better, “convinced felon Trump”

        It’s great because unlike “Governor Trudeau”, it’s actually true

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Pardoning Ulbricht is the incredibly thin silver lining of Trump’s presidency. These drug war advocates talk like they really believe this problem can be solved with criminal justice, meanwhile they defund harm reduction education and make healthcare inaccessible. It’s diabolical.

    • Professorozone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I had never heard of him or the Silk Road. I just looked it up and it seems like there was some benefit to creating a place where people could find drugs without the dangerous human encounters that can happen during these sales but it also said that the site was used to trade in illegal weapons, hacking tools and tutorials, hit men for hire and other unlawful goods and services. Doesn’t sound like much of a silver lining to me. More like an aluminum lining.

      • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Would you trade in weapons or hacking tools? Those are societal problems and locking up a single person makes literally zero difference to that problem. The reality is that there are now many competing sites offering the same items and worse. The opioid crisis in America was created by literally one family, the Sackler’s, why aren’t they in prison? This is a justice system that behaves like a banana republic.

        • Professorozone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Your agreement could be used for the crime of mass shootings. It’s a societal problem, what’s the use in locking up one person?

          I think if it’s true, he should be locked up AND the Sacklers right next to him.

          • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            This is a criminal justice system where penalties scale with skin colour and inversely with wealth. They got pissy with Ulbricht due to the sheer scale of the manhunt required to get one person, a vast sum was spent that could have been spent on healthcare and harm reduction. They don’t actually care about the damage that drugs do or rehabilitation, this is about punishment. Everyone needs to take responsibility for their actions, except wealthy white people.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Decriminalised use/possession, for sure.

      But I always think the libertarian “just legalise all the drugs” is just odd.

      Regulated? So you mean preventing people from taking really stupid shit? Sounds great sign me up lol

      People gotta accept there are trade-offs to living in a society, and one of those is that there’s a limit to which we allow each other to get high. Because there are some drugs that make people aggressive, and I personally think these ought to be curtailed where possible. (Again, not a “war on drugs” style curtailment. But distribution, still illegal and criminal)

      You wanna take shit like meth? Cool, go out to the woods and never use socialised medicine where workers are at risk from people on such drugs, or just randoms walking down the street.

      I don’t think taking hard drugs should put you in prison, or even give you a criminal record, but actually legalising the distribution? Nah. Go live in the woods/hills away from everyone else.

      • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t know if Meth use should constitute total exile from society, especially if you are trying to get off of it. Its a highly addictive drug and usually people use it because of a state of being deprived and desperate of any joy in life.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          This is a misunderstanding, apologies. I’m saying if you’re advocating complete legalisation of distribution of every single drug out there, then I’m using hyperbole to point out that this is too much “freedom to” without considering “freedom from”.

          I think all drug use should be decriminalised.