It all depends on what you value.

If you want the fastest phone for the lowest price, then you’re buying into those shady business practices and something akin to slave labor. (Not to sound judgey, I’ve bought my share of iPhones and galaxies too)

But if you want a phone that won’t contribute to a landfill as soon, was made by people paid a fair wage, where any hardware failure doesn’t make you start over with a new phone. Then try something like a fairphone. Specs aside, you’re paying for a different set of features.

I second this comment. It can be extremely tricky to solder something so small with so many contacts so close together.

But… if you get some sharp tweezers, I wouldn’t be surprised if you could pull some lint out of that USB port. And more often than not, that’ll make all the difference and it’ll charge normally again.

Blown capacitors are nice and obvious.

Most capacitors you’ll find are cylindrical, with a flat side of the cylinder pointed up. They’ll usually have a big X cut into that top side, allowing it to flex a bit. But if that top side is bulging a lot, that’s a warning sign, if it bulged so much that it opened up and it either looks burned on top, or some kind of paste is actually seeping out, then that thing is way past done.

With capacitors a visual inspection is really all you need. You’d actually need more expensive specialized equipment than a standard multimeter to actually test their capacitance. But if you look at it, and your description might include words like “exploded” or “popped”, or “wtf is this mess?”, then it’s bad.

Yeah, it sounded weird when I had it like that, so I added the disc to the end. Turned out, it was only 4 characters, so not a big imposition.

We are in space near the sun… And we have successfully used solar as far out as Jupiter.

Haha, no I didn’t account for lunar eclipses, but that lasts what, 2 hours?

But yeah, not falling over definitely improves the whole mission. No argument there.

Would it barely work, or would it always work?

If you plan to land on the pole, at a high altitude, you could potentially have direct line of sight to the sun 24/7 all year round. From the ground, the sun would appear to travel left to right along the horizon, making a full circle over the course of a month. You just need your solar panels pointed to the sides, not up.

However, if they aren’t directly on the pole, they could still plan their landing to be in a location that gets sunlight for 15 earth days straight, with 0 interruption. As that might be more than the necessary time period for their experiments, that’s probably perfect. And that doesn’t even require being at a high elevation.

Also, being on the pole doesn’t result in dimmer sunlight than on the equator like it would on earth. No atmosphere means the poles get the same completely unfiltered sunlight.

Look, the vast majority of lunar landers (and there have been quite a few) have used solar power, it’s the obvious choice in space.

I mean, you’re not wrong. A low center of mass is legitimately a good idea.

I really don’t understand the tall moon lander strategy… I mean, if you’re going to design it with a high center of gravity, then design it to fall over… Just use two landing legs instead of four, to ensure it falls over the right way. Then you put the solar panels on the side, so that when it topples over they’re facing up.

I’ve literally done this in Kerbal space program, it’s a pretty reliable landing system if your probe is tall.

Well, if we have boots on the moon, at that point we don’t need probes like these. At that point you just drop a sensor, or whatever experiment you want directly on the surface.

Eh… I think they should stick to solar power. Given how much trouble they’ve been having, let’s not give them any weapons grade isotopes…

For what it’s worth, just last week, Firefly stuck the landIng on their first attempt. They’re seriously killing it these days, I’m happy for them.

I’m going to go out on a limb and say this company that makes DVDs probably also makes Blu-Ray discs.

I mean yeah, most systems with a reservoir are going to use some kind of feed tubes to get the ink to the print head, and tubes just clog; basically, they only have 2 states of existence and one of them is “clogged”. If you do very regular printing, like a full color page at least twice a week, then they aren’t going to clog, but very few people actually print that consistently.

Truth be told, I’m just done with inkjet printing all together. At this point I can’t recommend anything but a laser printer, you tend to pay more up front, but then it actually works and it keeps working for a decade or more.

Meh, I think it’s pretty straight forward. It’s just a description of the scenario.

Mario games are first party content, because they’re made by the same company that makes the console. This says nothing positive or negative about the game, just who developed it.

I’ve used printers that don’t have cartridges, instead they just have ink wells you can fill with any ink. You do have more freedom with ink choices, but they’re a different kind of hassle. It’s not simply a better solution.

(Speaking of solutions, sometimes the ink you buy is more of a suspension than a solution, and it’ll clump up and dry in the feed hoses, a real pain in the ass.)