it’s just us, some bots, real world events, and random latency between instances as they federate

  • kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    Everything is an algorithm. Even just drawing rounded corners on a button is an algorithm.

  • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    You may be misunderstanding what an algorithm is, because I don’t see how your post relates to algorithms.

    Am algorithm is just a defined series of steps to do something. Doing long division would be an algorithm.

    Social media sites need to rank the posts that it shows to users, and it uses algorithms for that. People talk about social media algorothms because social media sites often select an algorithm that is specifically designed to prioritize the posts that keep users engaged. Lemmy has an algorithm. If you’re sorting by Hot or Scaled, that’s an algorithm. The main difference is that this algorithm is available for people to see and has been selected to actually do what it says it does

    • blackberry@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      yes, in designed algorithms (although it’s hard to argue that “hot” sorting is an “algorithm” unless we’re being pedantic). but in a colloquial sense, from an end user’s perspective, the thing they see is “the algorithm”. which for lemmy is about as natural as I described, unless I’m missing something (like the rate of photons hitting under sea cables), since there isn’t a suggestion engine for the “all” feed

      • Snazz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        in a colloquial sense, from an end user’s perspective, the thing they see is “the algorithm”.

        Yes, usually the default or most common method of aggregating posts is what people talk about when saying “the algorithm”

        However, any method of sorting posts is by definition an algorithm. “top” is an algorithm, “new” is an algorithm, if you can compare two posts and have a method to choose which one to display first, that right there is an algorithm.

        I’d actually argue that the “hot” algorithm is one of the more opaque ones. It sorts posts based on a composition of different metrics, and It’s unclear exactly what these metrics are and how they are combined.

        • blackberry@midwest.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          yeah totally, but those are basic algorithms and most lay people don’t even realize them to be. also I doubt many developers would show their boss “hey I built this awesome algorithm, it sorts by up votes” or “by time created” and continue having their job unless they built a recommendation engine per user or demographic, which is the generic corporate standard

          which is why I like Lemmy/fediverse. it lets things be much more “organic” for lack of a much better word

  • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Although on most other sites the algorithm tries to figure out what you want to see where as on Lemmy it’s serving you outrage and US politics wether you want it or not.

  • Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Commercial website feed shaping algorithm:

    • Promoter feeds you what you want (to addict you), not what you need (to improve your life), manipulating you to make money for advertisers. You may be allowed to follow things.
    • Filter omits what is banned or shadowbanned by the platform owner, manipulating you politically. You may be allowed to mute or block things.

    They decide what you think about and don’t know.


    Lemmy feed shaper:

    • Fuzzy promoter: You choose one from a handful of simple open source ranking algorithms (which can be fooled by bot activity)
      https://join-lemmy.org/docs/users/03-votes-and-ranking.html
      Unfortunately the default ranking promotes new content only, so older valuable content is forgotten.
    • Strict promoter: You follow what you want (tediously one by one - there are no associations between similars)
      This too lets older content be forgotten - you have to go and dig up your followeds’ content published before following.
    • Filter: You block what you avoid (instances, communities, users), but topics leak between communities (but some apps support keyword muting, which doesn’t work on pictures of text)

    Fediverse feed shaper lacks a defined topic hierarchy for accurate content tagging (of instances, communities, posts, replies, users) by users, preferably with web of trust between taggers.

    Quora had a precise topic taxonomy until 2023 or so - my feed was excellent (except for some spam, because no web of trust). Then the remaining co-founder enshittified it, filling my feed with viral click-hits.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    imo the thing that makes “the algorithm” of most sites bad is just that it is completely invisible to you and something you have no choice about