Don_Dickle@lemmy.world to Explain Like I'm Five@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoELI5 How the WPA under Rosevelt now considered socialism? It employed millions of people and they built some of the most remarkable things. How come this is frowned upon in the US?message-squaremessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up150arrow-down11
arrow-up149arrow-down1message-squareELI5 How the WPA under Rosevelt now considered socialism? It employed millions of people and they built some of the most remarkable things. How come this is frowned upon in the US?Don_Dickle@lemmy.world to Explain Like I'm Five@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-square4am@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·2 days agoTrue answer: no one was squeezing the project for profit. That’s it. Rich people don’t want anything to happen here they can’t grab a piece of. Fucking equity gooners
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoBut they could, and did.
True answer: no one was squeezing the project for profit.
That’s it. Rich people don’t want anything to happen here they can’t grab a piece of. Fucking equity gooners
But they could, and did.