The article’s title does not match the content. I read it and it does not talk about how Musk controls Trump. It talks about retaliation for those organizing protests against Tesla.
Welcome to Lemmy, where people’s personal agendas/marketing shape the titles of their posts.
The title of the post matches the title of the article
I’m talking about the body of the text of the article vs its title, the same as the person that I replied to. I don’t care about the ‘red herring’ assertion you are making.
And while we are at it, the article title doesn’t match the body of the article itself.
I get how you want to ‘Kill the Messenger’ and diminish my rep here, but don’t be so literal/pedantic, and goal post moving.
Call BS? What he said is literally, explicitly true: If you click on the article, that’s the title of it. OP didn’t change the title to fit an agenda, he used the article’s title.
The post title is an exact and faithful copy of the linked article, though. There’s no editorializing here.
That’s one of my points. They could have changed the title of the Lemmy post (like what is done MOST of the time around here) to not match the subject of the article but instead be accurate for us Lemmy readers, and not just duplicate the same/wrong title. The “editorializing” in this case is the NOT correcting of the title in the Lemmy post.
So either the person who posted here on Lemmy didn’t read the article they posted about, or they decided to purposely carry forward the invalid title from the article, after having read the article. (Or, this is just an astroturfing article and we are all wasting our time commenting here.)
Snowflake, if you don’t like the article headline the author used, downvote and move on and email the author. Cripes, not everything is about you sweetheart.
ETA. Man that signature is annoying, just clogs up the thread. Sorry but damn, if that doesn’t just scream, “it’s all about me!”
Snowflake, if you don’t like the article headline the author used, downvote and move on and email the author. Cripes, not everything is about you sweetheart.
No, its not about me, its about all of us here on Lemmy, and the quality of posts we get.
I don’t think he is talking about the title of the post on Lemmy but the title of the Yahoo article. Your point about people on Lemmy changing the title is not how things look.
“Welcome to Lemmy, where people’s personal agendas/marketing shape the titles of their posts.”
That has no barring on how Yahoo named their title.
Welcome to Lemmy, where people’s personal agendas/marketing shape the titles of their posts.
This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
The title of the post matches the title of the article, this isn’t a case of a poster editorializing.
I’m going to call b.s. on that one. I read the article. And so did others.
Edit: From the comment I initially replied to…
And how you replied to me replying to the above …
I’m talking about the body of the text of the article vs its title, the same as the person that I replied to. I don’t care about the ‘red herring’ assertion you are making.
And while we are at it, the article title doesn’t match the body of the article itself.
I get how you want to ‘Kill the Messenger’ and diminish my rep here, but don’t be so literal/pedantic, and goal post moving.
This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Call BS? What he said is literally, explicitly true: If you click on the article, that’s the title of it. OP didn’t change the title to fit an agenda, he used the article’s title.
I’m pretty sure he’s a sov cit. Don’t bother trying to reason with him.
No, I pay my house taxes, and drivers license fee, and my car registration, etc., etc., etc.
Weak attempt.
This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
If you read the article, you would have seen that the title of the article matches the title of the post…
Dammit Bobby?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
He’s a big playa, you have no idea
The post title is an exact and faithful copy of the linked article, though. There’s no editorializing here.
That’s one of my points. They could have changed the title of the Lemmy post (like what is done MOST of the time around here) to not match the subject of the article but instead be accurate for us Lemmy readers, and not just duplicate the same/wrong title. The “editorializing” in this case is the NOT correcting of the title in the Lemmy post.
So either the person who posted here on Lemmy didn’t read the article they posted about, or they decided to purposely carry forward the invalid title from the article, after having read the article. (Or, this is just an astroturfing article and we are all wasting our time commenting here.)
This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Snowflake, if you don’t like the article headline the author used, downvote and move on and email the author. Cripes, not everything is about you sweetheart.
ETA. Man that signature is annoying, just clogs up the thread. Sorry but damn, if that doesn’t just scream, “it’s all about me!”
No, its not about me, its about all of us here on Lemmy, and the quality of posts we get.
This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
And yet, i just see you bitching about it. Were you elected to speak for me? I don’t recall that.
You must be fantastic at Community volunteer efforts/work. /s
This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Since you speak for me, I’ll take your word for it.
I don’t think he is talking about the title of the post on Lemmy but the title of the Yahoo article. Your point about people on Lemmy changing the title is not how things look.
That has no barring on how Yahoo named their title.