Two years ago it was plenty capable of this. There aren’t any obvious patterns these “should” be, so it’s difficult to spot anything “obviously wrong”, but a lot of it has very AI vibes.
The “obviously wrong” thing is that it looks like a photo of stones, but those things can’t be stones (e.g. the feather pattern, radial patterns)… I guess someone could have 3d modelled it, but it seems too random for that…
But yeah, not complaining about the AI-ness, but “old” hurts when you’ve been using the internet ten times longer than the thing being describe 🥲
Two years ago it was plenty capable of this. There aren’t any obvious patterns these “should” be, so it’s difficult to spot anything “obviously wrong”, but a lot of it has very AI vibes.
Here’s the original, marked as AI: https://stock.adobe.com/images/stones-on-the-beachthe-rolling-stones%2Cthe-rolling-stones-copacabana-beach%2Cge/589377052
You can still like it as background. That’s allowed.
The “obviously wrong” thing is that it looks like a photo of stones, but those things can’t be stones (e.g. the feather pattern, radial patterns)… I guess someone could have 3d modelled it, but it seems too random for that…
But yeah, not complaining about the AI-ness, but “old” hurts when you’ve been using the internet ten times longer than the thing being describe 🥲
Oh thanks, i always got the feeling that was AI, but i liked the color palette too much to ignore that.