• rabber@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    How many men died over there though. Those jobs became vacant

    Honestly your comment triggers the fuck out of me. Are you saying women had it worse in ww2? lol should men returning from war not be entitled to their job back?

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      To explain your downvotes.

      Women were encouraged to join the work force on top of all of the parenting/wifely duties they were saddled with for generations. This was a lot of work, but it also provided a glimpse into financial independence and equal placement in the workplace for the first time.

      But when the war was over, women were encouraged to jump right back into the kitchen.

      should men returning from war not be entitled to their job back

      There are many jobs that need to be done to make society work. There are plenty of jobs at home that they could have taken.

      • rabber@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I feel as if that’s kind of fair given that the men were the ones who had to die without any choice in the matter, no?

        Also I didn’t know I was downvoted as I have that turned off lol

        • ch00f@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.I._Bill#Problems

          Except a lot of men who fought over there were rewarded with returning back to the bottom rung of the socioeconomic ladder.

          Status quo was maintained. Women and people of color were promised opportunity and reward for helping with the war effort, but largely didn’t get it.