• vintageballs@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Well they published their source code.

    It’s not as permissively licensed as usual open source projects, but I would argue that in the true sense of the phrase, this falls under “open source”.

      • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Correct. The non open source licenses, such as 'fair code ’ are not open source. They are available, but not open.

        It dilutes the true meaning, and I find it a little nefarious when a company calls their code open, when it’s in reality available.