Why would democrats be able to impose rules on someone outside of their party?

You have no problem with all the ancient democrats, right? Because they’re your guys?

What I was implying- was that it must have meant that the age limit should be set for ONLY democratic representatives, yes?

Yes. Considering how democrats have spent the past few decades fighting progressives and not republicans, the democratic party is run by inflexible old centrists whose only concern is enriching themselves. The party should implement an age limit. If republicans want to be run by idiotic old fossils, let them. It’s to their detriment, as it has been to democrats’ detriment. If anyone can be elected as an independent despite being old, more power to them.

But I’m sure you’ll change everything I’ve said here to mean something entirely different.

I’m sure you’ll conveniently misunderstand this comment as well.

Hey, you wanted to disqualify Sanders from public service on the grounds that he is both old and a democrat.

He’s not a democrat. And he is neither posturing nor out of touch, largely as a result of not tying himself to a party with no credibility.

Glad someone’s confronting republicans on Ukraine. No one we elected will.

So now he’s a democrat because it’s convenient for you?

I voted for harris, but didn’t love her positions. Am I one of the “stupid ones”?

Democrats fall in love. Republicans fall in line.

democrats know this. They keep giving us candidates that only the corporate/genocide wing of the party loves and ordering everyone else to fall in line.

Block me if you don’t like your talking points being challenged.

ACA has no public option because of Lieberman.

ACA has no public option because the public option was always a bill of goods. It was meant to be jettisoned at the very first opportunity, and it was.

Last time we had a filibuster proof majority was in 2009 for two different periods of two months each.

Any time during which democrats possessed a simple majority, they could have done away with the filibuster forever. Stop making excuses.

If they engaged with their voters, we wouldn’t have any democratic representatives over age of 65.

Bernie Sanders is not a democrat.

You think everyone you disagree with to your left is a tankie.

Hopefully they’ll have something worth turning out for. Let’s see if you become hostile to the suggestion that democrats need to become better in order to appeal to voters.

If democrats think that auction paddles are gonna solve this, they still need to be yelled at.

Sanders isn’t a democrat.

I get that you like mocking anyone who isn’t on board with genocide like you are.

Proper barnstorming.

Yes they did but they didn’t lose control of their narrative which is weak and feckless.

Weak and feckless is their brand.

There is a reason the main Democratic leadership is not pushing a more left leaning agenda, they would lose.

Well, they just lost by moving right.

Make an auction paddle that says “You’re useless.”

Not worth courting, evidently. But at least you got Dick Cheney.