…

I literally just corrected someone else about the opposite mistake.

“prizes”*

“I have drawn YOU as the soyjack and ME as the chad, therefore you lose the argument”

Are you autistic?

I know you’re engagement-farming, but “too”*.

“Ceci” si tu veux être précis

Since when is a Nobel prize winner admitting they were wrong and did not know enough any sort of “proof” that a whole discipline is not real? Get off your high horse…

I studied economics, none of it was purely psychology, and it was quite intense mathematically. It seems people conflate the discipline with business courses and assume it is just buzzwords and wishful thinking. When it is based on empirical data and experiments, just look at fields like how data science is applied or econometrics…

You’re all thinking of business. Economics is an empiric field of study that is based on science.

Downvotes while being right, the hive mind churns I guess. Man are you people idiotic.

1 looks the most balanced to pen spin with the least egregious lapel.

what -maxxing?!