Horribly misleading title. They haven’t found one. They are just talking about the odds of finding one, and they don’t even have a fancy approach.

I’ve actually found 1% to be a lot more common nowadays.

I read it more like “we were planning on helping the blind next but now this bullshit got in the way and we have to deal with it first unfortunately. DRM is hindering accessibility.”

Defaced then refaced