I wrote one is better, I didn’t write that one is forbidden. When we speak we use one at a time in a sentence (see meme above) so… how both?

Right. Let’s start by the right to privacy written in the constitution. A constitution is not for companies/corporations/enterprises/zaibatsus/gafam/moral entities.

Game master is better. Less Dungeon focused. Dungeon Master can also raise eyebrows when people think of Dungeon for BDSM.

Game Master is better.

By All-in, I wanted to refer to poker when the maximum risk is chosen.

Sur, elected representatives have to be trusted. Or we have propose an evolution. For now, I don’t know which one :/

the split between EU, government, Law enforcement authorities and the military is concerning

I find this reassuring. Of course there’s the habit to go left and right (not the political sides, just the directions) at the same time but it is also a way to avoid extrems.

I don’t want to have an All-in vote for all Europ layers and agencies at once with the lobbies of the music influencing what the armies could do.

If a chat control law passes in Europ, it will have to face the right to privacy.

It is done in a French Game INS/MV (In Nomine Satanis / Magna Veritas) which has been badly adapted in English.

There’s a d666 die made of 3d6. As you can play daemons or angels, 111 and 666 are critical successes or falures depending of your side in the Great Game.

Just to say: it is a humorous TTTRPG which feels like playing in Good Omens.