yea I used to use a raspberry pi but it is way too slow with a massive library. and for youtube even the 4 performance is dwarfed by some random half broken laptop. I haven’t tried the pi 5 but doesn’t really matter

It’s zipping a zip file. E

no it isn’t, zipping is lossless. encoding is lossy.

just sad…

No, the specific file size is irrelevant, he’s wanting smaller file sizes. CRF is a waste of data on more than 70% of scenes in hollywood movies. You set a bitrate and let it go. This is also why virtually all music now is VBR

unidentified attempts are just standard internet, bots are always poking every port on every IP 24/7 for last 25 years never stopping.

yea good luck with the ghost, otherwise there is always wordpress lol. If you’re wanting reader/viewer interaction there are only a few other than maybe just running a forum and posting _.

flatpak does indeed deduplicate. The stuff is updated to whatever is required as a dependency to whatever programs are installed. And versions are shared between applications when versions match as well…

So I am guessing it is just like flatpak

just fyi x264 and x265 are programs, written by VideoLAN organization. h264 and h265 are the codecs

And no doing that is no guarantee in visibly worse quality. Depends entirely on the video in that scenario. Plenty of them will look almost the same (though h265 is a lot blurrier than 264, I’d say h264 to h264 you’re likely to barely notice)

oh is this the proper way to link to other lemmy stuff without sending them to the other servers domain? to add the “!” in front? I’ve seen a lot of links before, which bring you to the other site. but never the “!”

also nearly all of the stuff on that site looks like garbage that will do exactly what you said.

and yes I looked at every single program… there aren’t that many

don’t even need chicken stock. If you cook the onions on bottom of pot first to brown, add chicken in and brown if you want then add all the other stuff + water. Add salt/pepper let it cook a while. This is literally how chicken stock is made. Onions + celery + carrots are called the holy trinity.

sausage & peppers & onions

just chop them up or don’t… and throw them all in. Sometimes I add sweet potato and or lentils

It’s pretty hilarious too, because tons of people would have more babies if they’d pay for them.

they already exist, the (software) interface is what needs work.

damn, of all the people you’d think those guys would actually have used the .local or .config =[

I have 73 dot files in my home directory lmao

Well people do get it, which is why the video wasn’t linked, so they can’t get it.

There are no lossless copies of any movie that have ever been released to the public

Delivery formats (h265, h264, h263 etc) are compressed and lossy.

You need to do 2 pass encoding. You should also not use CRF. You should pick a bitrate for the file size you want. Do a first pass which analyzes the video to see which sections require more data, and then run a second pass which will give high bitrate to more action scenes and lower bitrate to the credits and slower talking scenes.

Some action scenes require 5 times more data to look as good as a talking dinner scene, you couldn’t even notice the quality difference but the bitrate requirement is literally 5 times more.

You also need to use the slow preset and use x265 if you’re doing this to archive the stuff forever. Do it once and do it right.

Lossy to lossy generally doesn’t matter, that is why people transcode over the web on their media players and the video seems fine, they are doing lossy to lossy on the fly there. What is actually stupid is saving media that is 100gb that you ALWAYS have to transcode to play, so no matter what you’re ramping up your wattage use to play a file. This is also why 99.9999% of consumed media is compressed, you can’t play it otherwise. Internet would explode too.

Likewise can size a jpeg down from 4000kb to 1000kb and it’ll likely be almost identical and good enough for most cases. There are certainly zero handheld devices you’d be able to notice it on.** If you size the 4000kb to 40kb now there will be an actual noticeable difference. There are different levels to all of this. **

Similarly a 100mb wav file should be a 10mb mp3 and you can’t tell the difference. You couldn’t even tell the difference with a 3mb mp3 file.

it will result in visible and audible distortion

This is completely wrong, it “might” be visible is accurate. The actual answer is “that depends”

If a file is 5000kbps and you use 3000kbps you now have 25-50% savings like he just said. Nothing is overestimated, you can encode to w/e you want. This is how lossy encoding works, for everything.