

I think you have comprehensively missed the point of this post.
This post: “people under threat here’s some things you can do to lower your profile, mitigate risk a little” (positive actions)
Your comment (initial & reply): " how did the US let this happen & why didn’t you fight it, why aren’t you fighting it now"
That assumes a) the people most under threat are the same people who should be/can be fighting it b) that they didnt before the election and c) that the actions you prescribe will be effective.
So. Are your assumptions valid and do they actually add anything by voicing them ?
I know many in the US queer community worked tirelessly to prevent Trump being elected (assumption b) but now they really do need to get as low profile as possible, because there is a pogrom coming. Straight white people can afford to protest, the numbers are there. Minorities in small numbers not so much. Easy pickings.
Refusing to levy the federal tariff and daring Trump to do something about it as the only way this could work I could think of too. That could go pear shaped very fast