• galanthus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I believe that people that do not want to vote or do not feel particularly strongly about politics should be free to stay home. They might not know much about politics. Wouldn’t you rather have people vote who are actually invested into politics and come to vote because they actually want to? Also, I do not think it is ok to force people to participate in democracy in suvh a manner.

    Just because you reckon your party would have won if you forced people to vote, does not mean it should be done.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s true that mandatory voting nets a lot of low information voters. It also encourages a lot of people to check the major party’s policies who otherwise wouldn’t bother.

      I’m not aware of low information voters swaying the vote one way or another.

      By making voting mandatory, it becomes mandatory for everyone to have an opportunity to vote.

      • galanthus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        In what country do people not have the opportunity to vote? Even if that is the case, why not just make the voting accessible without forcing people to vote?

        I just don’t see the point.

          • galanthus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            It seems to me that there is a difference between telling someone to take and interest and forcing them to vote even though they do not care to do that on their own.