• RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Buddy you started off with “fuck economic theory”. You clearly know almost nothing about the subject. Why are you trying to make claims about a subject you aren’t educated on?

    We abandoned a lot of those taxes because they weren’t effective. Dropping the top rate from 90% to where it was in 1983 brought in more tax revenue as tax evasion and avoidance dropped. These are the kinds of things you would know if you had an education in macro

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      And there we go… I must not know anything about economics because you’ve been fed convenient models that justify the decision to cut taxes, and I’m not quoting them back to you

      And FYI, I even added a side note about this - want to know some tax avoidance strategies that I like? R&D. Higher wages and benefits to compete over talent. Fancy offices and better equipment. Swag and giveaways to capture customer loyalty

      This is why fuck “fuck economics”. I tell you it worked, we had a less inequal society, and you come back with “well, cutting this raised tax revenues”.

      Of course it did - it let the wealthy open up a spigot from companies to their portfolios, and the government gets a portion.

      It incentivized slashing corporate spending, but corporate spending is good - it’s money flowing back into the economy. Even if they keep it in a slush fund, at least that fund will offset loans needed to expand or weather a storm - loans that also funnel money upwards and essentially force companies to pay a tax to the rich to continue to exist

      But please, keep dismissing everything I say as “they just don’t understand economics”. No, I understand it well enough to know that what I was being taught didn’t add up

      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        You literally started off by dismissing economic theory and then you needed me to explain basic stuff to you. You can’t claim to have an informed opinion on this subject after that. Your analysis isn’t going to be particularly useful if you don’t understand the basics of a subject as you have already dine.

        You clearly don’t understand the subject but rather than lashing out at people who can tell this why not fix it by learning the basics? You might be less angry if you actually understand the subject better.