• PugJesus@lemmy.worldEnglish
    315·
    2 days ago

    It won’t federate to anyone, it’s the Group actor that forwards content to subscribers.

    Okay. So again, what’s the problem? Everyone should be happy.

    I think it is actually. If posting to lemmy.world comm, who then forwards that content to comm subs, makes me a user of lemmy.world’s service, then I don’t see how I wouldn’t be a user of Cloudfair’s services in that case. I’ve still technically initiated an interaction with Cloudfair servers, even if indirectly.

    Because Cloudflare’s whole deal is that they provide a service to sites, not users.

    Humor me for a moment - if you go to a website, directly, do you have to abide by their terms of service?

    Where are you getting the idea that I’m saying TOS shouldn’t be enforced? I’m not saying that, I’m disputing who it applies to.

    You said, and I quote:

    I just don’t think banning a remote user for TOS violation is a good one.

    • flamingos-cant@feddit.ukEnglish
      152·
      2 days ago

      Okay. So again, what’s the problem? Everyone should be happy.

      No one on lemmy.world will see anything Sag posts, ~ 1/3 of all Lemmy users. Not the end of the world, but it can be demotivating.

      Humor me for a moment - if you go to a website, directly, do you have to abide by their terms of service?

      No, a TOS is a contract, you have to agree to it to be subject to it.

      Where are you getting the idea that I’m saying TOS shouldn’t be enforced? I’m not saying that, I’m disputing who it applies to.

      You said, and I quote:

      I just don’t think banning a remote user for TOS violation is a good one.

      Remote user, i.e. someone who’s account isn’t on lemmy.world. Local accounts on lemmy.world should still be subject to the TOS.

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        310·
        2 days ago

        The problem remains that the second lemmy.world allows content created by someone underage to federate onto their server, they probably have some legal responsibility regarding that data. And if there is personal information in there, it gets tricky pretty fast in some jurisdictions.

        LW don’t want legal problems, that’s literally all there is to this.

        Whether LW can enforce their ToS on remote users is a different question, and even if the answer to that is “no” then they could still include that clause in every single LW community’s rules.

        • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          32·
          1 day ago

          Whether LW can enforce their ToS on remote users is a different question, and even if the answer to that is “no” then they could still include that clause in every single LW community’s rules.

          If they do, we’re going to see a wave of communities migration away from LW